runwayinuse

04KS Kraemer Airfield

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. No weather observation available.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 27 9 21 3

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

27 26% 2000 ft
9 26% 2000 ft
21 24% 1400 ft
3 24% 1400 ft
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 27

Runway 9

Runway 21

Runway 3

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METARUNAVAILABLE No weather observation found
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

04KS field & runways

Kraemer Airfield, Minneola, Kansas. Field elevation 2551 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Private use.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.076°/year west — about 1° every 13 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
21 216.0° 211.4° matches rule gives runway 22 in ~47 yr 1,400 ft TURF
27 269.8° 265.2° matches 2,000 ft TURF
3 36.0° 31.4° matches rule gives runway 4 in ~47 yr 1,400 ft TURF
9 89.8° 85.2° matches 2,000 ft TURF

Generated 12:24:57Z · auto-refreshes · JSON