runwayinuse

26R Jackson County

33
PROBABLE 67%

Runway 33 — wind slightly favors it, low confidence

Based mostly on wind; no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.

certainty: 67% evidence: NONE no tower now

N 33 15

Wind 010° true at 4 kt · VFR · 23 min old · from KARM (27.2 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

33 65% 3393 ft · 3 kt head, 3 kt x-right
15 35% 3393 ft · 3 kt TAIL, 3 kt x-left

Active NOTAMs affecting runways

LIGHTING until 11-13 23:59Z
AD AP LGT ALL U/S
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 33

Runway 15

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 23 min Nearest station KARM (27.2 nm away)
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

26R field & runways

Jackson County, Edna, Texas. Field elevation 62 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 3.0°E on record, 2.4°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.08°/year west — about 1° every 12 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
15 149.8° 147.3° matches 3,393 ft ASPH left
33 329.8° 327.3° matches 3,393 ft ASPH left

Generated 11:18:16Z · auto-refreshes · JSON