runwayinuse

2O6 Chowchilla

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. ADS-B tracking just started here — traffic history is still building. No weather observation available.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 12 30

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

12 50% 3253 ft
30 50% 3253 ft · right traffic
Why — evidence behind this answer

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METARUNAVAILABLE No weather observation found
ADSBWARMING_UP 3691 min Only 0 min of track history so far
NOTAMERROR NOTAM source unreachable
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (Only 0 min of track history so far)

Was this right?

2O6 field & runways

Chowchilla, Chowchilla, California. Field elevation 243 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 15.0°E on record, 12.3°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.087°/year west — about 1° every 11 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
12 135.0° 122.7° matches rule gives runway 13 in ~26 yr 3,253 ft ASPH left
30 315.0° 302.7° matches rule gives runway 31 in ~26 yr 3,253 ft ASPH right

Generated 11:18:41Z · auto-refreshes · JSON