runwayinuse

35W Port Washington/Didier Fld

19
PROBABLE 67%

Runway 19 — wind slightly favors it, low confidence

Based mostly on wind; no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.

certainty: 67% evidence: NONE no tower now

N 19 1

Wind 210° true at 4 kt · VFR · 22 min old · from KMKE (29.6 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

19 68% 2000 ft · 4 kt head, 2 kt x-right
1 32% 2000 ft · 4 kt TAIL, 2 kt x-left
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 19

Runway 1

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 22 min Nearest station KMKE (29.6 nm away)
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

35W field & runways

Port Washington/Didier Fld, Port Washington, Wisconsin. Field elevation 754 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT).

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.022°/year west — about 1° every 45 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
1 1.4° 5.6° matches 2,000 ft TURF
19 181.4° 185.6° matches 2,000 ft TURF

Generated 11:13:36Z · auto-refreshes · JSON