runwayinuse

8CD4 Basin Fld

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 24 6

Wind 190° true at 3 kt · VFR · 30 min old · from KAPA (20.6 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

24 54% 2464 ft · 2 kt head, 3 kt x-left
6 46% 2464 ft · 2 kt TAIL, 3 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 24

Runway 6

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 30 min Nearest station KAPA (20.6 nm away)
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

8CD4 field & runways

Basin Fld, Elizabeth, Colorado. Field elevation 6943 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Private use.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.08°/year west — about 1° every 12 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
24 250.1° 242.8° matches rule gives runway 25 in ~27 yr 2,464 ft TURF
6 70.1° 62.8° matches rule gives runway 7 in ~27 yr 2,464 ft TURF

Generated 12:22:41Z · auto-refreshes · JSON