runwayinuse

C57 Millers Landing

28
PROBABLE 60%

Runway 28 — wind slightly favors it, low confidence

Based mostly on wind; no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.

certainty: 60% evidence: NONE no tower now

N 28 10

Wind 210° true at 4 kt · VFR · 69 min old · from KOZW (32.0 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

28 56% 1875 ft · 2 kt head, 4 kt x-left
10 44% 1875 ft · 2 kt TAIL, 4 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 28

Runway 10

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 69 min Nearest station KOZW (32.0 nm away)
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

C57 field & runways

Millers Landing, Elsie, Michigan. Field elevation 757 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT).

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.005°/year west — about 1° every 200 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
10 90.0° 96.7° matches 1,875 ft TURF
28 270.0° 276.7° matches 1,875 ft TURF

Generated 12:23:37Z · auto-refreshes · JSON