runwayinuse

KCEY Kyle-Oakley Fld

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. Weather observation is 279 minutes old — treat with caution.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 5 23

Wind 050° true at 3 kt · VFR · 279 min old

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

5 52% 6202 ft · 3 kt head, 0 kt x-right
23 48% 6202 ft · 3 kt TAIL, 0 kt x-left
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 5

Runway 23

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 279 min
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

KCEY field & runways

Kyle-Oakley Fld, Murray, Kentucky. Field elevation 577 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 2.0°W on record, 3.2°W today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.057°/year west — about 1° every 18 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
23 229.8° 232.9° matches rule gives runway 24 in ~36 yr 6,202 ft ASPH
5 49.8° 52.9° matches rule gives runway 6 in ~36 yr 6,202 ft ASPH

Generated 11:13:50Z · auto-refreshes · JSON