runwayinuse

KCXW Conway Rgnl

4
PROBABLE 60%

Runway 4 — wind slightly favors it, low confidence

Based mostly on wind; no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.

certainty: 60% evidence: NONE no tower now

N 4 22

Wind 090° true at 3 kt · VFR · 26 min old · from KLIT (23.5 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

4 57% 5500 ft · 2 kt head, 2 kt x-right
22 43% 5500 ft · 2 kt TAIL, 2 kt x-left
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 4

Runway 22

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 26 min Nearest station KLIT (23.5 nm away)
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMERROR NOTAM source unreachable
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

KCXW field & runways

Conway Rgnl, Conway, Arkansas. Field elevation 276 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 1.0°E on record, 0.2°W today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.071°/year west — about 1° every 14 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
22 224.6° 224.8° matches rule gives runway 23 in ~2 yr 5,500 ft CONC
4 44.6° 44.8° matches rule gives runway 5 in ~2 yr 5,500 ft CONC

Generated 11:18:38Z · auto-refreshes · JSON