KOEO L O Simenstad Muni

PROBABLE 67%

Runway 22 — wind slightly favors it, low confidence

Based mostly on wind; no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.

certainty: 67% evidence: WEAK no tower now

Wind 190° true at 9 kt · VFR · 33 min old · from KMSP (34.2 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

22 67% 2065 ft · 7 kt head, 5 kt x-left

10 19% 5006 ft · 1 kt head, 9 kt x-right

28 14% 5006 ft · 1 kt TAIL, 9 kt x-left

4 <1% 2065 ft · 7 kt TAIL, 5 kt x-right

Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 22

WIND 7 kt headwind, 5 kt left crosswind 33 min ago +1.30
PRIOR runway length 2065 ft -0.09

Runway 10

WIND 1 kt headwind, 9 kt right crosswind 33 min ago -0.14
PRIOR runway length 5006 ft +0.09

Runway 28

WIND 1 kt TAILWIND, 9 kt left crosswind 33 min ago -0.42
PRIOR runway length 5006 ft +0.09

Runway 4

WIND 7 kt TAILWIND, 5 kt right crosswind 33 min ago -8.04
PRIOR runway length 2065 ft -0.09

Sources consulted

source	status	age	note
D_ATIS	UNAVAILABLE		No D-ATIS at this field
METAR	OK	33 min	Nearest station KMSP (34.2 nm away)
ADSB	UNAVAILABLE		No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAM	OK
CIFP	NOT_CONFIGURED		Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

KOEO field & runways

L O Simenstad Muni, Osceola, Wisconsin. Field elevation 906 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 1.0°E on record, 0.6°W today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.037°/year west — about 1° every 27 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against *today's* declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
Runway	True	Magnetic	Number	Length	Surface	Pattern
10	103.8°	104.4°	matches rule gives runway 11 in ~15 yr	5,006 ft	ASPH	left
22	224.3°	224.9°	matches rule gives runway 23 in ~3 yr	2,065 ft	TURF	left
28	283.8°	284.4°	matches rule gives runway 29 in ~15 yr	5,006 ft	ASPH	left
4	44.3°	44.9°	matches rule gives runway 5 in ~3 yr	2,065 ft	TURF	left

Generated 12:25:43Z · auto-refreshes · JSON

KOEO ☆ L O Simenstad Muni