runwayinuse

KPBF Pinebluff Rgnl/Grider Fld

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. Weather observation is 1631 minutes old — treat with caution.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now Class E

N 36 18

Wind 340° true at 11 kt · VFR · 1631 min old

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

36 50% 5998 ft · 10 kt head, 4 kt x-left
18 50% 5998 ft · 10 kt TAIL, 4 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 36

Runway 18

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 1631 min
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

KPBF field & runways

Pinebluff Rgnl/Grider Fld, Pine Bluff, Arkansas. Field elevation 206 ft. Class E airspace. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 2.0°E on record, 0.6°W today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.072°/year west — about 1° every 14 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
18 179.8° 180.4° matches 5,998 ft ASPH left ILS
36 359.8° 0.4° matches 5,998 ft ASPH left

Generated 13:03:32Z · auto-refreshes · JSON