runwayinuse

KPVF Placerville

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. Weather observation is 389 minutes old — treat with caution.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 23 5

Wind calm · VFR · 389 min old

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

23 50% 3914 ft
5 50% 3914 ft · right traffic
Why — evidence behind this answer

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 389 min
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

KPVF field & runways

Placerville, Placerville, California. Field elevation 2586 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 14.0°E on record, 12.7°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.091°/year west — about 1° every 11 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
23 242.8° 230.1° matches rule gives runway 24 in ~54 yr 3,914 ft ASPH left
5 62.8° 50.1° matches rule gives runway 6 in ~54 yr 3,914 ft ASPH right

Generated 13:03:48Z · auto-refreshes · JSON