runwayinuse

MO9 Kingsley Airfield

18
PROBABLE 60%

Runway 18 — wind slightly favors it, low confidence

Based mostly on wind; no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.

certainty: 60% evidence: NONE no tower now

N 18 36

Wind 120° true at 5 kt · VFR · 72 min old · from KHFJ (19.5 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

18 58% 3119 ft · 2 kt head, 4 kt x-left · right traffic
36 42% 3119 ft · 2 kt TAIL, 4 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 18

Runway 36

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 72 min Nearest station KHFJ (19.5 nm away)
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

MO9 field & runways

Kingsley Airfield, Miller, Missouri. Field elevation 1272 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT).

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.068°/year west — about 1° every 15 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
18 184.3° 183.7° matches rule gives runway 19 in ~19 yr 3,119 ft ASPH-TURF right
36 4.3° 3.7° matches rule gives runway 1 in ~19 yr 3,119 ft ASPH-TURF

Generated 12:26:42Z · auto-refreshes · JSON