runwayinuse

O20 Kingdon Airpark

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. Wind calm — no directional preference.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 12 30

Wind calm · VFR · 25 min old · from KLVK (32.2 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

12 50% 3851 ft
30 50% 3851 ft
Why — evidence behind this answer

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 25 min Nearest station KLVK (32.2 nm away)
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMERROR NOTAM source unreachable
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

O20 field & runways

Kingdon Airpark, Lodi, California. Field elevation 18 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 16.0°E on record, 12.7°E today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.09°/year west — about 1° every 11 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
12 135.8° 123.1° matches rule gives runway 13 in ~22 yr 3,851 ft ASPH left
30 315.8° 303.1° matches rule gives runway 31 in ~22 yr 3,851 ft ASPH left

Generated 11:17:58Z · auto-refreshes · JSON