runwayinuse

MO22 Jta Asbell Fld

14
WIND_INFERRED 70%

Runway 14 — favored by the wind (5 kt at 120° true)

Based on wind only — no traffic or ATIS to confirm. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available.

certainty: 70% evidence: NONE no tower now

N 14 32

Wind 120° true at 5 kt · VFR · 72 min old · from KHFJ (30.9 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

14 74% 3000 ft · 4 kt head, 2 kt x-left
32 26% 3000 ft · 4 kt TAIL, 2 kt x-right · right traffic
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 14

Runway 32

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 72 min Nearest station KHFJ (30.9 nm away)
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

MO22 field & runways

Jta Asbell Fld, Carl Junction, Missouri. Field elevation 940 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Private use.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.069°/year west — about 1° every 14 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
14 144.5° 143.4° matches rule gives runway 15 in ~22 yr 3,000 ft TURF
32 324.5° 323.4° matches rule gives runway 33 in ~22 yr 3,000 ft TURF right

Generated 12:26:34Z · auto-refreshes · JSON