runwayinuse

5MO7 Pilots Point

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. ADS-B tracking just started here — traffic history is still building.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now

N 23 5

Wind 140° true at 6 kt · VFR · 56 min old · from KBBG (21.3 nm away)

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

23 50% 2315 ft · 0 kt head, 6 kt x-left · right traffic
5 50% 2315 ft · 0 kt TAIL, 6 kt x-right
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 23

Runway 5

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 56 min Nearest station KBBG (21.3 nm away)
ADSBWARMING_UP 3690 min Only 0 min of track history so far
NOTAMOK
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (Only 0 min of track history so far)

Was this right?

5MO7 field & runways

Pilots Point, Shell Knob, Missouri. Field elevation 1020 ft. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Private use.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.069°/year west — about 1° every 14 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
23 229.5° 229.0° matches 2,315 ft TURF right
5 49.5° 49.0° matches 2,315 ft TURF

Generated 11:51:28Z · auto-refreshes · JSON