runwayinuse

KOSC Oscoda/Wurtsmith

?
UNKNOWN

Unknown — not enough evidence to call a runway

We don't know, and saying so beats guessing. No D-ATIS feed here — a voice ATIS/AWOS may exist; check the frequency. No ADS-B traffic data available. Weather observation is 1522 minutes old — treat with caution.

certainty: — evidence: NONE no tower now Class E

N 25 7

Wind 300° true at 5 kt · VFR · 1522 min old

▶ Listen live — ATIS/CTAF on LiveATC opens LiveATC’s own player · verify the broadcast yourself

25 50% 11801 ft · 2 kt head, 4 kt x-right
7 50% 11801 ft · 2 kt TAIL, 4 kt x-left
Why — evidence behind this answer

Runway 25

Runway 7

Sources consulted

sourcestatus agenote
D_ATISUNAVAILABLE No D-ATIS at this field
METAROK 1522 min
ADSBUNAVAILABLE No ADS-B track history here yet
NOTAMERROR NOTAM source unreachable
CIFPNOT_CONFIGURED Instrument procedures: phase 4

Recent operations

No operations observed in the last hour. (No ADS-B track history here yet)

Was this right?

KOSC field & runways

Oscoda/Wurtsmith, Oscoda, Michigan. Field elevation 633 ft. Class E airspace. Non-towered (NON-ATCT). Magnetic variation 7.0°W on record, 7.6°W today.

The FAA's variation of record is the number this field was surveyed against; the second is where north points now, from WMM2025. It is moving 0.011°/year east — about 1° every 91 years — which is why runway numbers eventually stop matching their pavement.

Runway data from the FAA NASR 01 Oct 2026 cycle. Where NASR locates both thresholds, the true heading is the bearing between them rather than NASR's whole-degree alignment. Magnetic is that heading against today's declination from WMM2025, not the field's variation of record — so it can differ from the chart by the gap between the two shown above. The number painted on the runway is the one ATC uses.
RunwayTrueMagnetic Number LengthSurfacePattern Notes
25 238.1° 245.7° matches 11,801 ft ASPH ILS
7 58.1° 65.7° matches 11,801 ft ASPH left

Generated 11:17:08Z · auto-refreshes · JSON